Whatever the exact nature or cause of the problem, every year thousands of companies suffer the unnecessary financial burden of absenteeism related to musculoskeletal problems.
Being able to identify and manage such injuries and any possible associated absence, will allow you to control and reduce the potential for absenteeism in your company. This in turn will have a dramatic effect upon the profitability of your business.
Our service model of providing both ‘reactive’ assessment and treatment, combined with ‘proactive and preventative’ approaches through workplace assessment and training, has proven very successful. In fact, one client demonstrated savings of over £185,000 in the first 18 months.
Cost Benefits – Food Manufacturing
Example 1
A recent customer (food manufacturing) at a site with approximately 900 employees showed a minimum saving of £20,000 in the first 5 months of service.
A sample of 26 employees was taken out of a total of 82 employees seen in this timescale.
£17,000 was saved through the reduction in absence due to early return to work and £3,000 due to absence prevention (i.e. maintaining individuals at work, whether it be on normal or slightly modified duties).
Further investment in the service was supported by analysis indicating a cost benefit ratio of 1:3. For further information contact us...
Sample ratio 1:9
Example 2
An existing customer of 6 years (food manufacturing) at a site with approximately 500 employees, showed a minimum saving of £22,000 in a 5 month timescale.
A sample of 18 employees was taken out of a total of 48 employees seen during this period. £18,000 was saved through reduction in absence due to early return to work and £4,000 was saved due to absence prevention (i.e. maintaining individuals at work, whether it be on normal or slightly modified duties).
The ongoing investment in providing the service for 6 years was supported in this sample, as well as previous samples at a cost benefit ratio of 1:3. For further information contact us...
Sample ratio 1:16
Cost Benefits – Distribution Centre
Example 3
An existing customer of over 3 years (distribution centre) with approximately 400 employees on one of it’s sites, showed a minimum saving of £27,000 over a 6 month period.
A sample of 31 employees was taken out of a total of 62 employees seen during this period.
£13,000 was saved through reduction in absence due to early return to work and £14,500 was saved due to absence prevention (i.e. maintaining individuals at work, whether on normal or slightly modified duties).
This study showed a cost benefit ratio of 1:4, which supports the company’s decision to continue and extend the service. For further information contact us...
Sample ratio 1:8
Cost Benefits – Call Centre
Example 4
An existing customer of over 2 years (national bank) with approximately 5,000 employees on one of it’s sites, showed a minimum saving of £54,000 over a 6 month period.
A sample of 45 employees (taken out of a total of 130 employees seen during this period) was used in this analysis. £18,000 was saved through reduction in absence due to early return to work and £38,000 was saved due to absence prevention (i.e. maintaining individuals at work, whether on normal or slightly modified duties).
This study showed a cost benefit ration of 1:2, in support of the ongoing service. For further information contact us...
Sample ratio 1:8
Cost Benefits – Pharmaceuticals
Example 5
An existing customer of 7 years (pharmaceutical) with approximately 450 employees on one of their sites, showed a minimum saving of £12,000 over a 6 month period.
A sample of 23 employees was taken out of a total of 75 employees seen during this period.
£3,000 was saved through reduction in absence due to early return to work and £9,000 was saved due to absence prevention (i.e. maintaining individuals at work, whether on normal or slightly modified duties).
This study showed a cost benefit ratio of 1:2 in support of the ongoing service. For further information contact us...
Sample ratio 1:5